June 21, 2012
Maine Turnpike Authority
Attn: Public Relations Dept.
2360 Congress St.
Portland, ME 04102
Attn: Public Relations Dept.
2360 Congress St.
Portland, ME 04102
Dear MTA Board Members,
It is important for the Biddeford-Saco Chamber of Commerce
& Industry to submit comments on the proposed toll increase options you
have provided to the public.
Thank you for scheduling a public hearing in Saco. Biddeford-Saco is a strong economic generator
here in York County. Our businesses
range from manufacturing to tourism, from small retail on Main Street to large
retail in shopping plazas, from recreational and commercial uses of the river
and Saco Bay to farm land a short ways inland.
Our businesses use the Maine Turnpike to move their products and bring
their employees to work.
We are very appreciative of the quality of the Turnpike
roads and the dedication of the Turnpike employees. We are well aware that the costs of
maintaining high quality, safe roadways have increased and will likely increase
further in the future.
As a business trade association, we must weigh the impacts
of the proposed options on our member businesses. Our preferred option would be no toll increases
at all. Our business community has
barely seen the light of day following several years of less than stellar
economic times. A stronger economy where
businesses thrive and consumers buy wanted products as well as needed products
will generate additional revenues you are seeking. A welcoming business climate that encourages
businesses to relocate in our region will generate revenues you are seeking.
Biddeford and Saco recently received the Governor’s certification for being
“Business Friendly Communities” and we see this as a very positive step forward
that will increase the possibilities of growth and expansion of businesses
here.
Option 1, focuses on the York Toll and Commercial
Vehicles. This does not seem like a
viable option since it too specifically puts the burden on too small a user
group. Commercial vehicles are already
experiencing pain from the increase in fuel costs. Increasing their multiplier to 1.00 will be
discouraging to business.
Option 2 - may be the option that impacts our area the most
since it increases tolls at all side tolls.
Currently, consumers only pay to enter the Turnpike at the Biddeford and
Saco Exits. They do not pay to Exit.
Increasing the cash rate from $.50 to $1.00 to travel 4 miles seems a
bit drastic and will certainly discourage people in the area from using the Turnpike. This will increase traffic on Rt 1 which is
already very busy. In my opinion,
disgruntled drivers won’t stop to shop. It is quite possible that the increase
in Rt 1 traffic would negatively impact the business community in both Cities.
Option 3- Already stated the negative aspects of singling
out commercial vehicles
Option 4 – While this option appears to levy pain on
everyone, the increase in ETC by 30% seems a bit aggressive and it increases
the multiplier on commercial vehicles by .50 which as already stated seems to
target an important business segment which will increase the costs of doing
business for our members. We oppose any increase in side tolls for Biddeford
and Saco Exits since it is such a short distance.
Option 5 – we cannot support an increase in the minimum toll
by $.50 between Biddeford and Saco and once again targeting commercial vehicles
adds costs to doing business for our members.
Option 6 – We do not understand the logic behind increasing
the toll on Wells Northbound. Being
located North of Wells we see this increase as a discouragement to consumers to
come to Biddeford-Saco. As already
stated, we are opposed to an increase in the minimum toll between Biddeford and
Saco.
Option 7 – While this may be the staff’s preferred
alternative, it sure seems to send a negative message to our number one
industry-tourism. Welcome to Maine-Open
your Wallet could be a sign placed next to the one that says we are Open for
Business. As already stated-we oppose any increase to the minimum toll between
Biddeford and Saco and increases to commercial vehicles.
Option 8 – same as already stated - No to increasing rates
on commercial vehicles at this time.
Option 9 - No to
increase at side tolls. 30% increase in ETC seems very high. Opposed to
commercial increases as already stated
Option 10 – Same comments as previously made
I cannot pretend to know all the details of the decisions
the MTA board is facing. I can only remind
you that Maine historically recovers slowly from economic downturns. While there are glimmers of positive upticks,
our local businesses are doing their best to dig out from the impacts of the
poor economy. Locally we are facing property tax increases and now we are asked
to shoulder increases from your agency.
We fear that our citizens will be losing more than they are gaining
which will cause more losses and more negativity. After reading the news articles per the
previous public hearings, I find it inappropriate to support only those options
that impact others. We have simply tried
to focus on the impacts of the proposals on our business community.
And while it is
hopeful that visitors will pay a significant portion of the toll revenues-the
reality is that we who live and work here year round bear the brunt of these
increases.
Once again I thank you for the opportunity to weigh in on
these proposed toll increases.
Respectfully submitted,
Craig A. Pendleton
Executive Director
http://www.maineturnpike.com/MaineTurnpike/media/PDF/Toll-Options.pdf